- Title
- 'A particular disappointment?' Judging women and the High Court of Australia
- Creator
- McLoughlin, Kcasey
- Relation
- Feminist Legal Studies Vol. 23, Issue 3, p. 273-294
- Publisher Link
- http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10691-015-9301-9
- Publisher
- Springer
- Resource Type
- journal article
- Date
- 2015
- Description
- This article examines whether the gender balance on the High Court of Australia has disrupted the gender regime. In so doing it considers the first lead judgments of the three women judges who sat concurrently on the High Court of Australia between 2009 and early 2015. The High Court has adopted an interesting informal practice of welcoming new judges whereby the newest member authors the lead judgment and their judicial colleagues offer a one-line concurrence. The way in which judicial authority is conferred in these judgments is reminiscent of the space in political spheres where an incumbent has their first opportunity to set out their identity and agenda in a speech free of the noise of dissent or debate; the 'maiden' speech. In that space the price an incumbent pays for comity is conformity. This article contends that the first judgment is a useful way of situating a discussion about women judges' contributions vis-à-vis difference by querying the extent to which the woman judge can ever shake-off her status as the maiden bound to conform for the sake of comity.
- Subject
- women; gender; judging; feminism; difference; judicial authority
- Identifier
- http://hdl.handle.net/1959.13/1314132
- Identifier
- uon:22712
- Identifier
- ISSN:1572-8455
- Language
- eng
- Reviewed
- Hits: 3437
- Visitors: 3389
- Downloads: 1
| Thumbnail | File | Description | Size | Format |
|---|